Stefka Parveva
Institute for Historical Studies (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract: Studies in the field of trade reveal that the main contingent of merchants came from urban communities and traded in urban and international markets. But as nine out of ten subjects of the Sultan in Bulgarian lands were peasants, it is logical to assume that some of them made their living in the field of trade. In this connection it should be noted that the issue of the involvement of peasants as professional traders in the economic life of the Ottoman Empire has not been sufficiently studied in the historiography on this topic.

This study aims to outline a tentative portrait of rural pedlars, who took part in trade exchange both between the cities and the countryside and between different regions of the Empire at the end of 17th and the 18th centuries. Based on some case studies, features of their family and property status have been reconstructed. Issues, related to the legal regulation of their business activities have been analysed. The range and volumes of the goods they sold have been investigated. Problems related to the common commercial practices of partnerships between and lending to rural pedlars have been addressed. Conclusions have been drawn regarding the involvement of the institutions in regulating the trade activities and the relationship between the pedlars and their families, partners and lenders; the level of their literacy; the role their trips had on the level of awareness of the communities, in which they operated; the impact of their professional activity on the formation of modern traders in the Bulgarian society from the pre-Tanzimat era.

The study draws on unpublished Ottoman Turkish documents – inheritance inventories of deceased traders, partnerships and lending litigation, sultan’s fermans, petitions and grievances, tax inventories, as well as on promulgated laws, travelogues, etc.

Keywords: Rural Pedlars, Material Status, Migrations, Trade Partnerships, Credit, Kadı Court



Etudes balkaniques (Sofia) Issue 2016 N 2

Stefka PARVEVA, Creating and preserving the collective memory of war conflicts in the Ottoman border periphery: the battles of Michael Viteazul with the Ottoman Empire during the War of the Holy League (1593-1606)

Abstract: This study focuses on some aspects of the ways and mechanisms for preserving the memory of traumatic events during military conflicts among the subjects of the Sultan. These aspects have to do with the functioning of the Ottoman bureaucratic, judicial and military institutions on local and central level, and with communication with the local population. For this purpose, the study looks at the townsmen of Silistra and their conduct, as well as that of the Ottoman authorities, during and after the war with the Holy League in 1593 -1606 and the late 17th century. The analysis of the sources reveals that the process of preserving and passing on the information involved agents from all levels of the Ottoman hierarchy and various administrative practices were applies related to the registration and taxing of the population, and to the creation of formal and informal archival collections. The preserving and passing on of the memory was effected both by means of written communication among the institutions (through the document flow toward the centre and back) and by oral communication within the discussions among the representatives of the authorities and taxpayers in the kadı court, and among the members of the community and its elders who attended the court sittings.

Written evidence of the war events, or more specifically, of the feelings that overwhelmed the people and the disturbing thoughts that haunted them in those troubled times were left by a number of literate Bulgarians in the margins of liturgical books and even on the walls of the churches. These short marginal notes testify that the clash between the warring armies did not bring any hope to the Christians, but only fear in people’s souls and awareness of the trouble that had befallen them in those “severe and turbulent times”.

And finally, the folklore also provides information about the war, transforming in a specific way the memory of the events and people, berhyming the attitude of the Bulgarians to the afflictions that befell them.

Keywords: Michael Viteazul, War, People’s Conduct during the War, Collective Memory, Folklore